Aquaculture Europe 2023

September 18 - 21, 2023

Vienna,Austria

BOTANICAL COMPOUNDS INHIBITS SALMON PATHOGEN Piscirickettsia salmonis IN IN VITRO STUDY

F. Caruso1*,  A. Romero 2,3, T. Pérez2,3, N. Santibáñez2,3 , A. Piva1,4, E. Grilli4,5

 

1Vetagro S.p.A., via Porro 2, 42124 Reggio Emilia (Italy)

2Laboratorio de Inmunología y Estrés de Organismos Acuáticos, Instituto de Patología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile (Chile)

3Interdisciplinary Center for Aquaculture Research (INCAR), University of Concepción, Concepción (Chile)

4University of Bologna, DIMEVET, via Tolara di Sopra 50 - 40064 Ozzano Emilia, BO (Italy)

5Vetagro Inc., 17 E. Monroe St., Suite #179, 60603 Chicago (IL), USA

E mail: fabrizio.caruso@vetagro.com

 



Introduction

The illness with the biggest economic impact on Chile’s salmon farming sector is Salmonid Rickettsial Septicemia (SRS) caused by the bacterium Piscirickettsia salmonis, which results in significant mortality rates during the last phase of their productive cycle at sea (Rozas & Enriquez, 2014).  Antimicrobials, most frequently florfenicol, remain the major treatment and control option for this infection because currently  and commercially available vaccinations have not shown the expected efficacy levels (SERNAPESCA, 2016) . Botanicals are frequently employed in zootechnical feed additives for terrestrial animals, and they are gaining popularity as an alternative to using antibiotics  for their antimicrobic and immunostimulants properties (Beltran & Esteban, 2022 ; Kuralkar & Kuralkar, 2021; Rossi et al., 2020). To the best of our knowledge, there are not many research on aquaculture, and nothing is known about how they affect SRS control.  The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility in using  the active principles of P rototype  α, a thymol-based  blend of botanicals, as a mean to support the control of the seasonal outbreaks of SRS.

Materials and methods

In order to reach the aim of the study, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assays were performed. The antimicrobial activity of the compound was evaluated using the microdilution method in CASO broth  (Vera et al., 2012) , in which the active principles of the blend were dissolved ranging from 10 to 5000 ppm. Wells with no addition of products and with ethanol equivalent to the highest concentration were used as control and vehicle respectively while wells without bacterial inoculum served as negative controls. The trial was performed in quintuplicate. The Chilean P. salmonis isolate PS005 belonging to the EM genogroup was inoculated at a final concentration of 107 CFU/mL, and the plates were incubated for 96 h at 18 °C. After incubation, bacterial growth was evaluated by absorbance measurement at 620 nm and the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the tested compounds that totally inhibited the growth of the bacterium. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnet’s post hoc test, and differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.0001.

Results

 The in-vitro  effect  of  Prototype α’s active principles  on P. salmonis were evaluated in a  MIC assay providing  bacterial growth inhibition to a statistically significant degree starting as early as 10 ppm  until  proving a  complete inhibition  of the pathogen from 200ppm upward.  Results are provided below  in

Conclusions

Aquaculture is o ne of the  fastest expanding sectors, contributing worldwide to food provision (FAO, 2022). Due to  the limitations and concerns on anti-m icrobial resistance coming from consumers and institutions alike (FAO, 2023) , it is one of the challenges of feed additive to support the  aquaculture production by regulating harmful bacteria, promote growth and stimulate the immune system. These in-vitro results, coupled with many studies proving the health boost and growth enhancement of botanicals additive, show a promising new opportunity  for these compounds and their use in support to SRS control.

 References

 Beltrán J. M. G. & Esteban M. A. (2022). Nature-identical compounds as feed additives in aquaculture, Fish & Shellfish Immunology, Volume 123, 2022, Pages 409-416, ISSN 1050-4648, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2022.03.010.

 FAO (2022) . The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en.

 FAO (2023) Antimicrobial Resistance : What is it?  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed in February 2023, from https://www.fao.org/antimicrobial-resistance/background/what-is-it/en/

 Kuralkar, P. & Kuralkar S.V. (2021). Role of herbal products in animal production – An updated review, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Volume 278, 114246, ISSN 0378-8741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114246.

 SERNAPESCA (2016). Informe sobre uso de antimicrobianos por la salmonicultura nacional: 2015.  Subdirección de Acuicultura, Departamento de Salud Animal,

 Rossi, B., Toschi, A., Piva, A., & Grilli, E. (2020).  Single components of botanicals and nature-identical compounds as a non-antibiotic strategy to ameliorate health status and improve performance in poultry and pigs. Nutrition Research Reviews, 33(2), 218-234. doi:10.1017/S0954422420000013

 Rozas M. & Enriquez R. (2014). Piscirickettsiosis and Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish: a review.  J. Fish. Dis. 2014; 37: 163–188. doi:10.1111/jfd.12211

 Vera, T., Isla, A., Cuevas, A., & Figueroa, J. (2012).  Un nuevo medio de cultivo líquido para el patógeno Piscirickettsia salmonis. Archivos de medicina veterinaria, 44(3), 273-277.