Aquaculture Europe 2021

October 4 - 7, 2021

Funchal, Madeira

Add To Calendar 06/10/2021 16:30:0006/10/2021 16:50:00Europe/LisbonAquaculture Europe 2021NUTRITIONAL INNOVATIONS IN SUPERIOREUROPEAN SEA BASS Dicentrarchus labrax GENOTYPES: IMPLICATIONS IN FISH PERFORMANCE AND GUT HEALTHFunchal-HotelThe European Aquaculture Societywebmaster@aquaeas.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYaaVZHLXMfzTRLzDrHmAi181982

NUTRITIONAL INNOVATIONS IN SUPERIOREUROPEAN SEA BASS Dicentrarchus labrax GENOTYPES: IMPLICATIONS IN FISH PERFORMANCE AND GUT HEALTH

 

D. Montero1*; S. Torrecillas1; S. Rimoldi2, A. Serradell1, R. Fontanillas3 , F. Acosta1, F. Allal4, P. Haffray5, A. Bajek6 and G. Terova2

 

 

1 Grupo de Investigaci? en Acuicultura (GIA), IU-ECOAQUA, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Telde, Las Palmas, Canary Islands , Spain

 2 Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria , Via J.H.Dunant, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy.

 3 Skretting Aquaculture Research Centre, Stavanger, Norway.

4  MARBEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer , IRD, 34250 Palavas-les-Flots, France

5 SYSAAF (French Poultry and Aquaculture Breeders Technical Centre), 35042 Rennes, France

6 Ecloserie Marine de Graveline Ichtus , Route des Enrochements , 59820 Gravelines, France

 

 

 * Corresponding author E-mail: daniel.montero@ulpgc.es

 



Introduction

A proper development of the aquaculture sector implies: (a) an effective replacement of marine raw ingredients (fish meal, FM; fish oil, FO) by sustainable raw materials and (b) a successful breeding program addressed to improve growth, feed utilization and fish health. Thus, the formulation of diets for genetically selected European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax ) to determine how the interaction of breeding programs and nutrition together determines fish performance and diet utilization is needed, being the aim of the present study .

Materials and methods

 During a production cycle a sea  bass  selected genotype (GS) and an unselected  (wild)  genotype  (NGS) (15 ± 0.5 g initial mean weight), were fed  a control diet with a low content of FM/FO based in nowadays commercial formulations and a “future” diet based on low FM/FO contents but formulated to cover the predictable sea bass requirements of the GS and enable them to completely express their growth and feed utilization potential .  Fish were fed for nine months in triplicate (3 replicates/diet/genotype ).  Growth performance and feed utilization were monitored along the feeding trial. Additionally, at the beginning (t=0) and at the end of the feeding trial (t=9 months), fish were sampled for fillet biochemical composition and fatty acid profiles (15 fish/diet/genotype ), morphological evaluation of the intestine (9 fish/diet/genotype) , microbiota  (6 fish/diet/genotype) and gene expression analyses (6 fish/diet/genotype) .

Results

Sea bass  genotype markedly affected fish performance. After 8 weeks of feeding GS sea bass presented higher weight gain than NGS, regardless of the diet fed (Fig. 1). This marked effect was maintained to the end of the experiment .  Fillet biochemical composition results indicated that  GS fish present higher (p<0.05) lipid and lower ash (p<0.05) percentages than NGS fish. Fish fed Future diet presented higher (p<0.05) lipid content than fish fed control diet. Besides, a significant interaction (p<0.05) between genotype *diet was detected for ash and protein content. Fish fed future diet presented higher (p<0.05) liver lipid content in expenses of protein, ash and protein percentages. A significant interaction (p<0.05) between genotype*diet was detected for moisture liver content. Fillet and liver fatty acid profiles will be also discussed.

 In terms of  intestine  gene expression, responsiveness to the feeding trial was more relevant in posterior section, where a significant interaction  (p<0.05) between strain*genotype was found in the expression of  cd4, il-1β, il-10, mhc ii, and tnf-α genes .  Specifically, il-1β was up regulated in distal intestine of NGS fish compared to GS Europen sea bass , while tnf-α  expression  was up regulated (p<0.05) in GS fish fed future diet compared to fish fed the control diet . The expression of il-10 was  up regulated (p<0.05) in GS fish  compared to NGS fish. These results were correlated with the morphology patterns observed in both intestinal regions .

 The reduction of gut microbiome biodiversity was more evident in GS than in NGS fish .

Concerning gut microbiome analysis, a reduced biodiversity and species richness were found in fish fed experimental diets compared to their T0, but not among them .

 At family level, Lactobacillaceae , Streptococcaceae , Staphylococcaceae , and Peptostreptococcales-Tissierellales were significantly less abundant in GS fish than in NGS fish, regardless of the diet . Accordingly, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus genera were absent in the same fish. In contrast, in NGS fish the presence of Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus , and Pseudomonas  was detected.

 In summary, our data indicated  a higher influence of the genotype on  D. labrax growth performance, than the diet formula fed. However, the diet formula influenced the composition of the fillet and the liver as well as their fatty acid profile. On the other hand,  the genotype  had a slight influence in modulating the resident intestinal microbiota composition compared to  the GS strain , but  NGS fish showed the presence of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria in their intestine. The NGS strain revealed a trend to show a like-chronic inflammatory status, that was more evident in fish fed future diet.

Acknowledgements

 This research was funded by  the EU Horizon 2020  project AquaIMPACT (Genomic and nutritional innovations for genetically superior farmed fish to improve efficiency in European aquaculture) ; number: 818367.