Aquaculture Europe 2025

September 22 - 25, 2025

Valencia, Spain

Add To Calendar 25/09/2025 16:00:0025/09/2025 16:15:00Europe/ViennaAquaculture Europe 2025MONITORING LOADS AND MOVEMENTS OF SUGAR KELP Saccharina latissima CULTIVATION LINES IN AN IMTA FARMSC 1+2, VCC - Floor 1The European Aquaculture Societywebmaster@aquaeas.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYaaVZHLXMfzTRLzDrHmAi181982

MONITORING LOADS AND MOVEMENTS OF SUGAR KELP Saccharina latissima CULTIVATION LINES IN AN IMTA FARM

H.M. Føre1* ,  O.J. Broch1 , B.S.B Kristensen2 , S. Forbord1 , P.C. Endresen1 , T. Marstrand3

 

1 SINTEF Ocean, Postboks 4762 Torgarden, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway.

2 NTNU  Department of Biology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

3Folla Alger , Nordfoldveien 202 , 8286 Nordfold, Norway

 E-mail: Heidi.moe.fore@sintef.no



Introduction

Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA), involves  farming  of  multiple marine species at  different trophic levels  at the same  aquaculture site. In the AURORA IMTA project ,  integrated aquaculture of  Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) and the brown macroalgae  called sugar kelp ( Saccharina latissima )  is realized and developed at a full-scale sea-based facility in the North of Norway.  Possible benefits of IMTA are currently investigated along with developing robust solutions for both biological production and structural design  The  main  idea is that the kelp can  benefit from  absorbing  dissolved inorganic  nutrients from the salmon farming. In addition, their joint production may be an effective shared use of sea area.

 A part of the current RnD -work includes  developing knowledge to ensure a safe and effective design of such IMTA-farms. Currently there is little knowledge on expected loads from wave s and currents (hydrodynamic loads) on seaweed cultivation lines (Endresen et al., 2019; Kool et al., 2022), and seaweed weight (hydrostatic loads). Th is  results in application of  unnecessarily  high safety factors in design, which  may result in sub-optimal  and overly expensive  farm designs. In addition,  increased knowledge of possible  displacements and movements of cultivation lines is of great interest, a s this may affect growth (through  e.g. light, temperature and water quality) and  lead to line entanglement and seaweed abrasion.

Materials and methods

Five cultivation lines with sugar kelp have been instrumented with two depth sensors and a load chackle each from April 25th to July 10th 2024. In addition, the mass density of the kelp was measured once or twice a month to facilitate weight calculation.

Initial numerical analysis indicated that  cultivation lines were horizontal at high hydrodynamic loads, while they were sagging in calm water. Based on these findings, the experiment was designed to investigate the following hypotheses:

  1.  The kelp line position will vary both horizontally and vertically due to currents, waves and seaweed growth.
  2. Hydrodynamic l oads on cultivation lines can be found from load measurements during periods  when depth sensors indicate horizontal line positions.
  3. At maximum line sagging in calm water ,  the  seaweed  weight may be found from load measurements.
  4. Mass density of seaweed can be found using Archimedes principle and measurements of weight and volume of seaweed and seawater

 Since the kelp  would easily decompose during unfavourable storing conditions, our tests were done in the field using newly harvested seaweed kept in  fresh seawater.

Results

 All instruments, including five load chackles and ten depth sensors, worked well and produced continuous measurement data except during two periods of power failure. The findings supported all four hypotheses , also indicating that the  developed  methods for measuring of load, position and mass density worked well .

 Vertical  kelp line positions  varied with several meters, and large sagging coincided with low  measured loads. Peaks in load measurements coincided with h orizontal lines  (similar depth measurements over a line) po sitioned  at relatively shallow  waters.

 A method and procedure to measure mass density of seaweed (hypothesis 4) was developed and employed. The results showed that the kelp had a  mass density of 920 ± 86 kg/m3, based on 14 separate measurements. This is  lower than seawater, and it was observed that the kelp was floating (without visible air-bubbles). P revious literature has indicated  a mass density  of  about 1100 kg/m3 , i.e.  slightly higher than water ( Vettori & Nikora, 2017; Norvik, 2017). Possible reasons for this may be that the density may depend on site specific conditions like nutrients , kelp size and carbon content, morphology (Buck & Buchholz, 2004) or different treatment and storing of the kelp after harvesting .

References

 B. H. Buck, and C. M. Buchholz, “Response of offshore cultivated Laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the North Sea,” Aquaculture, vol. 250, no. 3, pp. 674-691, 2005.

 Endresen et al., 2019. Current Induced Drag Forces on Cultivated Sugar Kelp. OMAE2019-96375.

Kool et al 2022 (Wageningen notat).  Measuring standing crop on offshore seaweeds using drag forces.

 Vettori D, Nikora V, 2017. Morphological and mechanical properties of blades of Saccharina latissima. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 196:1–9

 C. Norvik, “Design of Artificial Seaweeds for Assessment of Hydrodynamic Properties of Seaweed Farms,” Master’s thesis, NTNU, 2017. Norvik et al.,