Aquaculture Europe 2026

September 28 - October 1, 2026

Ljubljana, Slovenia

Add To Calendar 30/09/2026 16:15:0030/09/2026 16:30:00Europe/ViennaAquaculture Europe 2026FINDING THE BALANCE: EFFECT OF FEEDING LEVEL ON GROWTH, CONDITION AND BODY COMPOSITION OF SUBADULT BURBOT Lota lota IN RECIRCULATING SYSTEMSUrska 1The European Aquaculture Societywebmaster@aquaeas.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYaaVZHLXMfzTRLzDrHmAi181982

FINDING THE BALANCE: EFFECT OF FEEDING LEVEL ON GROWTH, CONDITION AND BODY COMPOSITION OF SUBADULT BURBOT Lota lota IN RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS

J Claeyé 1, 2*, A Plovie1, A Guerrero Ogalla1, T Abeel1, H Arnouts1, S Aerts1

1 Aquaculture Education & Research Facility, Odisee University of Applied Sciences, Belgium

2 AquaLota, Fish hatchery, Belgium

Email: joachim.claeye@odisee.be  

 



Introduction

Burbot (Lota lota) gains attention in European intensive coldwater aquaculture due to its delicate

white fillets, high nutritional value comparable to its relative, Atlantic cod, and valuable by_products

such as liver, roe, and skin. Burbot exhibits environmental requirements similar to those of trout and

achieves comparable growth rates, while demonstrating greater hardiness and lower disease

susceptibility than other salmonids. These characteristics position burbot as a promising candidate

for diversifying inland freshwater aquaculture (Oliver et al., 2024). Since 2012, commercial hatcheries

have emerged in Belgium and Germany and fingerling availability is no longer a bottleneck. Although

burbot aquaculture remains in its early stages, Oliver et al. (2024) indicate that culture methods are

now adequate for commercial production. However, no studies have been conducted on the long

term effects of feeding levels on growth of juvenile burbot weighing over 30 g (Trejchel et al., 2014).

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of feeding levels on growth, condition and body

composition of growing juvenile to subadult burbot in RAS to identify the true optimal feeding level.

Materials and methods

In 15 cylindrical 120 L tanks, 60 fish were stocked per tank, of which 32 were individually PIT-tagged.

The fish had an average individual body weight of 34.66 ± 7.24 g. All tanks were connected to a single

intensive RAS, and the temperature was maintained at 15 °C. Five treatments, each in triplicate, were

assigned feeding levels ranging from 0.75 to 2.15% of biomass per day. Fish were fed a commercial

diet (Protec, 3 mm, Skretting) using automatic feeders.

Every three weeks, all fish were sedated and sampled. Of each PIT_tagged fish, body weight and length

were recorded. Specific growth rate (SGR), thermal growth coeficient (TGC) and Fulton’s condition

factor (K) were calculated. Total biomass per tank was measured to determine daily feed rations for

each treatment and to calculate the biological feed conversion ratio (FCRb). After the final sampling in

week 15, whole-body proximate composition was determined for six randomly selected pooled fish

per tank. In addition, the viscerosomatic index (VSI), hepatosomatic index (HSI), and Carcass Yield

were measured in eight randomly selected individual fish per tank.

Results and discussion

SGR and TGC increase with feeding level but level off from 1.45% feeding level, while FCRb steadily

increases with further increasing feeding level. Therefore, the optimal feeding level is around 1.45%

body weight per day, where SGR is near maximal and FCRb remains relatively efficient. A feeding level

of 1.10% will result in a more efficient FCRb with only a minor reduction in growth (Figure 1). Fulton’s

condition factor (K) was lower in only the 0.75% feed level treatment (Table 1). Hepatosomatic Index

(HSI) was significantly higher in the 1.45%, 1.80% and 2.15% feeding level treatments compared to

0.75%, while no statistic differences could be shown for Carcass Yield (data not shown).

 

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the European Union & the Flemish government through the ‘European

Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF)’ & ‘het Financieringsinstrument voor de Vlaamse

Visserij en Aquacultuursector (FIVA)’ grant for the AquaPlanner project. 

References

Oliver, L.P., Myrick, C.A., Fornshell, G., Cain, K.D. (2024) Life history and aquaculture methods for burbot (Lota

Lota). Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, Vol 32(2), 369-386,

https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2024.2308917 

Trejchel, K., Żarski, D., Palińska-Żarska, K., Krejszeff, S., Dryl, B., Dakowski, K., Kucharczyk, D. (2014) 

Determination of the optimal feeding rate and light regime conditions in juvenile burbot, Lota lota (L.) under

intensive aquaculture. Aquacult Int, Vol (22), 195–203, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9670-5