Aquaculture Europe 2021

October 4 - 7, 2021

Funchal, Madeira

Add To Calendar 06/10/2021 11:50:0006/10/2021 12:10:00Europe/LisbonAquaculture Europe 2021INTERANNUAL VARIATION IN ENERGY CONTENT OF MARINE COSTAL SESTON DETERMINED BY DIRECT CALORIMETRYSidney-HotelThe European Aquaculture Societywebmaster@aquaeas.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYaaVZHLXMfzTRLzDrHmAi181982

INTERANNUAL VARIATION IN ENERGY CONTENT OF MARINE COSTAL SESTON DETERMINED BY DIRECT CALORIMETRY

 

T. Strohmeier*, R. Filgueira, P. J. Cranford, L. E. Steeves, A. Aguera, C. Krogness and Ø. Strand

 

*Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes N-5817 Bergen

Email: tores@imr.no

 



Abstract

Suspension feeders (mollusks) are currently by far the world’s largest marine non-fed cultured production of animals [14]. This vast production capacity relies on their capacity to exploit the largest trophic resource in the marine environment, the seston. The seston comprises plankton and inorganic and organic matter in suspension. This multifaceted food resource varies on spatial and temporal scales with respect to concentration, biopolimeric composition, energy content and nutritional value [2-7, 9].

The seston food source, and the ecological and physical processes that control this food supply, fuels growth, sets the production capacity and determines the ecological carrying capacity of low trophic animal aquaculture [7, 8, 10, 11]. However, a unifying approach for quantifying this food resource that can explain growth, production and ecological carrying capacity is currently lacking.

Proxies of seston abundance and nutritional quality are typically converted to energy content units (J g-1) using a constant factor to estimate the capacity of the food supply to support bivalve production. The factors commonly used are 47.7 J mg-1 for phytoplankton carbon [16] and 23.4 J mg-1 for living organic “particle” [15]. There are few published studies on the energy content of mixed seston [1, 6, 12, 13, 17, 18] and to our knowledge none that has directly measured the temporal energy content of seston. Since the temporal variation in the relationship between the food proxy and the actual energy content of the seston is not known, there is a large potential for erroneous interpretation of the capacity of the ambient food resource to support aquaculture.

The presentation will summarize the temporal (interannually) variation in energy content of marine costal seston as determined by direct calorimetry.

1. Berg JA, Newell RIE (1986) Temporal and spatial variations in the composition of seston available to the suspension feeder Crassostrea virginica. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 23:375-386

2. Bernard I, De Kermoysan G, Pouvreau S (2011) Effect of phytoplankton and temperature on the reproduction of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: investigation through DEB theory. J Sea Res 66:349-360

3. Cranford PJ (1995) Relationships between food quantity and quality and absorption efficiency in sea scallops Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 189:123-142

4. Cranford PJ, Hill PS (1999) Seasonal variation in food utilization by the suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs Mytilus edulis and Placopecten magellanicus. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 190:223-239

5. Danovaro R, Fabiano M (1997) Seasonal changes in quality and quantity of food available for benthic suspension-feeders in the Golfo Marconi (north-western Mediterranean). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 44:723-736

6. Fegley SR, Macdonald BA, Jacobsen TR (1992) Short-term variation in the quantity and qualtity of seston available to benthic suspension feeders. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 34:393-412

7. Filgueira R, Grant J (2009) A Box Model for Ecosystem-Level Management of Mussel Culture Carrying Capacity in a Coastal Bay. Ecosystems 12:1222-1233

8. Filgueira R, Comeau LA, Guyondet T, McKindsey C, Byron C (2015) Modelling carrying capacity of bivalve aquaculture: a review of definitions and methods. Springer

9. Filgueira R, Guyondet T, Comeau LA, Tremblay R (2016) Bivalve aquaculture-environment interactions in the context of climate change. Global Change Biology:n/a-n/a

10. Grant J, Filgueira R (2011) Shellfish aquaculture and the environment. The application of dynamic modelling to prediction of production carrying capacity in shellfish farming. Wiley-Blackwell Science Publishers, Iowa

11. Kluger LC, Filgueira R, Wolff MJE (2017) Integrating the concept of resilience into an ecosystem approach to bivalve aquaculture management. 20:1364-1382

12. Navarro JM, Clasing E, Urrutia G, Asencio G, Stead R, Herrera C (1993) Biochemical-composition and nutritive-value of suspended particulate matter over a tidal flat of southern Chile. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 37:59-73

13. Navarro JM, Thompson RJ (1995) Seasonal fluctuations in the size spectra, biochemical-composition and nutritive-value of the seston available to a suspension-feeding bivalve in a sub-arctic environment. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 125:95-106

14. Olsen Y (2015) How can mariculture better help feed humanity? Frontiers in Marine Science 2:46

15. Parsons TR, Takahashi M, Hargrave B (1977) Biological oceanographic processes. Pergamon press

16. Platt T, Irwin B (1973) Caloric content of phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 18:306-310

17. SarĂ  G, Leonardi M, Mazzola AJC, Ecology (1999) Spatial and temporal changes of suspended matter in relation to wind and vegetation cover in a Mediterranean shallow coastal environment. 16:151-173

18. Widdows J, Fieth P, Worrall CM (1979) Relationships between seston, available food and feeding-activity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis. Mar Biol 50:195-207