Aquaculture Europe 2025

September 22 - 25, 2025

Valencia, Spain

Add To Calendar 23/09/2025 16:30:0023/09/2025 16:45:00Europe/ViennaAquaculture Europe 2025FEEDING IMMUNITY: EVALUATING FUNCTIONAL DIET EFFECTS IN RAINBOW TROUT Oncorhynchus mykiss DURING AN A. salmonicida OUTBREAKAUD 1, VCC - Floor 0The European Aquaculture Societywebmaster@aquaeas.orgfalseDD/MM/YYYYaaVZHLXMfzTRLzDrHmAi181982

FEEDING IMMUNITY: EVALUATING FUNCTIONAL DIET EFFECTS IN RAINBOW TROUT Oncorhynchus mykiss DURING AN A. salmonicida OUTBREAK

 Teresina De Iorioa* , Maria Carmela Scatàa , Francesca Apuzzob , Alessandra Crisàa , Andrea Gustinellib , Cinzia Marchitellia, Arianna Martinia , Marco Martinolia , Riccardo Napolitanoa , Domitilla Pulcinia , Nicolò Tonachellaa , Fabrizio Capoccionia

a Consiglio per la Ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), via Salaria 31, Monterotondo (RM) 00015, Italy.

b Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, via Tolara di Sopra, 50, Ozzano dell’Emilia (BO) 40064, Italy.

 Correspondence: teresina.deiorio@crea.gov.it



Introduction

 The misuse or overuse of antibiotics  has caused the  onset of antimicrobial-resistant strains of  Aeromonas salmonicida  in fish and the aquatic environment. Different strategies have been proposed to boost fish resistance to  A. salmonicida, one of the major pathogens of salmonids. Among the preventive approaches explored to increase natural resistance to disease in fish, probiotics, prebiotics, and immunostimulants  have emerged (Minářová et al. 2021).

 This study conceived an integrated approach to explore the potential immunomodulatory effects of a commercial feed, Protec (Skretting),  which contains β-glucans, vitamins C and E, and zinc (Bulfon et al., 2019),  and its ability to mitigate the  mortality caused by a naturally occurring A . salmonicida outbreak in adult rainbow trout.

Materials and Methods

 Adult rainbow trout (~300 g) were farmed in central Italy (Granica, RI). The animals were fed once a day with two commercial pelleted diets: 1) Optiline (Optiline , Skretting),  used as  a control diet, and 2) Protec (Protec, Skretting). Shortly after starting the commercial feeding trial, the farmer noticed a steady low-level mortality in both groups . After three weeks, 25 Optiline and 33 Protec fish were randomly caught using a fishing wade and immediately sacrificed for further examinations, as follows. External welfare indicators (Noble et al., 2022), biometric and autoptic indices were recorded. Peripheral blood was collected from the caudal vein and immediately transferred to heparinized tubes. The etiologic agent of  the  outbreak was detected by inoculating Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) and Blood Agar (BA) plates with target organs (brain, kidney, and spleen). Identification of the isolates was performed phenotypically by MALDI-TOF (MALDI Biotyper , Bruker), while the subspecies was genotypically identified by INgene ® q  Aeromonas salmonicida  (Gold Standard Diagnostics) through the StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems). Blood cell count was assessed at 400X magnification under an Axioplan microscope (Zeiss), and innate immunity parameters (leukocyte viability, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) production, and phagocytosis activity) were evaluated by flow cytometry with the CytoFLEX instrument (Beckman Coulter) and analysed with Kaluza software v 2.1 (Beckman Coulter).

Cell counts were analysed using the Chi-square test, while the other paramet ers were tested  using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney ( Bonferroni-corrected p-value ; p <0.05 was considered significant). Statistical analysis was performed with the open-source software Past v. 4.14.

Result and discussion

 After three weeks of the commercial feeding trial, no differences in either external welfare indicators or biometric parameters were observed between the Optiline and Protec groups. However, both groups showed Hepato-Somatic Index (HSI) and Spleen Somatic Index (SSI) values nearly twice the optimal range for rainbow trout (Nabi et al. 2022; Cardinaletti et al. 2022), suggesting that the mortality recorded could be related to the presence of an infectious agent. Mortality was significantly higher in the Optiline group compared to Protec (p<0.001), suggesting an improved immune competence in trout fed with an immunostimulant-rich diet (Redivo et al. 2023).

 The bacteriological culture examination of the target organs revealed the presence of systemic  A. salmonicida.  The subspecies salmonicida was detected in blood samples with no statistical differences  in prevalence (28% Optiline vs. 21% Protec). However,  the Optiline group displayed a significantly higher  A. salmonicida  gene copy number compared to the Protec group (p<0.05) , suggesting a less efficient pathogen clearance in individuals fed with  the Optiline diet. Consistently, trout fed with Protec showed a higher proportion of blood lymphocytes (p<0.05) and thrombocytes (p<0.05), and a lower number of neutrophils (p<0.05) . Lymphocytosis has been related to greater recruitment and activation of specific immune cells during systemic defensive response against bacteria (Bulfon et al., 2019).  Furthermore, a significantly lower number of leukocyte aggregates (leucoagglutination) was detected in the Protec group compared to the Optiline (p<0.01) .

 Leukocytes isolated from  trout fed with Protec showed significantly higher viability (p <0.01),  and lower apoptosis and death (p <0.05), paralleled by lower ROS production (p<0.05) . They also exhibited a greater proportion of phagocytic ROS-producing live myeloid cells (p<0.05). Overall, t hese data suggested that the immunostimulants included may induce a greater pathogen clearance in trout leukocytes (Dalmo and Bøgwald 2008).

Conclusion

Although severe alterations have occurred in fish affected by the pathogen, regardless of the diet administered, the data obtained by the conceived integrated approach suggest that the immunostimulant-enriched diet strengthens rainbow trout’s immune systems, partially mitigating  A. salmonicida infection.

References

Bulfon C, Pacorig V, Sarti M, et al (2019) Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2019.109885

 Cardinaletti G, Di Marco P, Daniso E, et al (2022) Animals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131698

 Dalmo RA, Bøgwald J (2008)  Fish  and Shellfish Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FSI.2008.04.008

 Nabi N, Ahmed I, Wani GB (2022) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.019

Minářová H, Bláhová L, Kalina J, et al (2021) Acta Vet Brno . https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202190020233

Redivo B, Derôme N, Kestemont P, Cornet V (2023) Microorganisms . https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020539